检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《生态经济》2017年第10期80-84,共5页Ecological Economy
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大项目"对政府全口径预算决算的审查和监督研究"(13JZD021);辽宁省财政科研基金资助项目"现代财政制度与辽宁预算管理改革问题研究"(14B003)
摘 要:基于中国2001—2014年31个省份的面板数据,采用系统矩估计实证分析方法,通过支出角度和自有收入角度来构建财政分权指标体系,探讨财政分权对我国产业结构调整的作用效果。研究结论表明:从全国层面来看,财政分权对产业结构的调整具有显著的促进作用;从地区层面来看,东部地区的财政分权对产业结构的调整具有显著的促进作用,并与全国作用效果保持高度一致。中西部地区作用效果则不然,该地区的财政分权对产业结构合理化水平提高具有显著的促进作用,而对产业结构高级化水平提高具有显著的抑制作用。最后,依据实证结论提出政策启示。This article makes use of the SYS-GMM to study the relationship between fiscal decentralization and industrial structure adjustment based on 31 provinces' (municipalities and autonomous regions) panel data from 2001 to 2014 in our country. The fiscal decentralization index system is constructed from the perspective of expenditure and income. And the conclusion is that: From the national perspective, fiscal decentralization has a significant effect on promoting adjustment of industrial structure; from regional perspective, the fiscal decentralization of the eastern region has a significant effect on promoting the adjustment of industrial structure, and is consistent with the national effect. But in the mid-west area, the fiscal decentralization has a significant effect on promoting the rationalization of industrial structure while it has a significant inhibitory effect on the improvement of industrial structure supererogation. Finally, according to the empirical conclusion, this article proposes some policy implications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42