社会生产的内在逻辑与交往异化:古典政治经济学批判——《詹姆斯·穆勒〈政治经济学原理〉一书摘要》的政治哲学解读  

The Internal Logic of Social Production and the Alienation of Communication: Criticisms of Classical Political Economy——A summary on James Miller 's Political Economics Principles from the perspective of Political Philosophy Interpretation

作　　者：臧峰宇[1] ZANG Fengyu

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学

出　　处：《思想战线》2017年第5期88-94,共7页Thinking

基　　金：中国人民大学明德青年学者计划暨中央高校专项资金资助项目"当代马克思主义政治哲学重大问题:对话与研究"阶段性成果(13XNJ048)

摘　　要：马克思在《巴黎笔记》中摘录了詹姆斯·穆勒《政治经济学原理》一书中关于生产、分配、交换和消费的论述并作评注,深入阐述了社会生产的内在逻辑及交往异化,实现了对古典政治经济学的功利主义思路的批判。马克思在一定程度上认可穆勒基于最大幸福原则的研究,同时以处于生成途中的历史唯物主义运思确认超越异化的人性复归之路,从而彰显其政治哲学的价值底蕴。马克思开启了研究异化问题的新视域,力图摆脱交往异化与资本逻辑的束缚,使劳动者走上为承认而斗争的自我实现之路。In Paris Notes Marx commented on James Mill＇s expositions on production, distribution, exchange and consumption, which he extracted from Mill＇s Elements of Political Economy, and elaborated on the internal logic of social production and communication alienation, providing a critique of utilitarian- ism in classical political economics. While Marx recognized to some extent Mill＇s studies based on the principle of the greatest happiness, he confirmed the way to transcend alienation and return to human na- ture with the emergent ideas of historical materialism, demonstrating its value in political philosophy. Marx opened up new horizons for the study of alienation in an attempt to throw off the shackles of the al- ienation of communication and capital logic and helped the workers embark on the self-realization road of fighting for recognition.

关 键 词：物象化 政治经济学原理 政治哲学 交往异化 巴黎手稿 

分 类 号：D09[政治法律—政治学]