工业用地绩效评价网络运行效率的分析与优化  

Analysis and Optimization on Operational Efficiency of Performance Evaluate Net of Industrial Land

作　　者：周咏馨[1] 吕玉惠[1] 李恬[2] 柳建荣 ZHOU Yongxin LYU Yuhui LI Tian LIU Jianrong

机构地区：[1]苏州科技大学工程管理系,江苏215009 [2]盐城市国土资源局盐都分局,江苏224002

出　　处：《城市发展研究》2017年第9期I0007-I0009,I0021,共4页Urban Development Studies

基　　金：江苏省盐都区建立税收与工业用地挂钩制度试点项目

摘　　要：基于社会网络分析法(SNA)研究我国工业用地绩效评价网络,选取了网络密度、网络凝聚力及结构洞指标来测度网络的运行效率。研究发现:(1)国土部门作为评价主体的网络中,绩效信息的调度权很集中,信息流通不是很通畅,网络成员之间的合作氛围不够友好;(2)税务部门与经信部门作为评价主体的网络中,绩效信息的调度权相对分散,具有的结构洞优势相对多一些,网络成员参与绩效评价工作的积极性相对高些;(3)三类评价网络的密度及凝聚力指标都没有达到0.5,普遍较低,信息在成员间流通的效率和速度受到限制。研究结果表明要想提升工业用地绩效评价网络的运行效率,必须构建绩效评价平台,并完善该平台的运行规制。This paper uses the social network analysis （SNA） to analyze the peribrmance evaluation network and chooses network density, network cohesion and structural hole index to measure the network efficiency. Study found that：（l） in the network of Land management departments as the appraising subject, the power of performance intbrmation is centralized, the circulation of information is not very smooth, and the cooperation atmosphere among the network members is not friendly enough; （2） In the network of Tax authorities, Economic and Information management departments as the appraising subject, there are relatively more advantages in the structure hole, where the right to performance intbrmation is relatively dispersed in which members of the network with relatively higher enthusiasm; （3） Density and cohesion indicators are not up to 0.5 and generally low in three kinds of network, where the efficiency and speed of intbrmation flow among members is limited. Conclusion： to improve the efficiency of pertbrmance evaluation network, it is necessary to build an e-platform on industrial land performance evaluation and improve its the operation regulation.

关 键 词：工业用地 绩效 评价 网络 效率 

分 类 号：F293.2[经济管理—国民经济]