基于AHP和GRA的橡胶火灾危险评价  

Fire Hazard Assessment on Five Kinds of Rubbers with AHP and Grey Relational Analysis

作　　者：傅应才 王勇[1] 张峰[1] FU Yingcai WANG Yong ZHANG Feng(College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology Qingdao ,Shandong 266042)

机构地区：[1]青岛科技大学环境与安全工程学院,山东青岛266042 [2]灭火救援技术公安部重点实验室,河北廊坊065000

出　　处：《工业安全与环保》2017年第9期63-66,共4页Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(51306097);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2014EEM037);灭火救援技术公安部重点实验室基金(KF201405)

摘　　要：表征火灾危险性的指标包括点燃时间、质量损失速率、比消光面积和峰值热释放速率等,但采用不同指标对材料的评价结果不一致。基于锥形量热仪测试的火灾危险指标参数,分别采用改进层次分析法和灰色关联分析方法综合评价了5种橡胶生胶的火灾危险性。结果表明,改进层次分析法与灰色关联分析得到的5种材料的火灾危险程度排序是一致的,火灾危险性从小到大依次为氯丁橡胶、三元乙丙橡胶、丁腈橡胶、天然橡胶、顺丁橡胶。Parameters for evaluating fire hazards include time to ignition, mass loss rate, specific extinction area and peak of heat release rate and so on, and different parameters brings about different assessment results. In this paper, the modified analytic hierarchy process （MAHP） and grey relational analysis （GRA） were respectively applied to comprehensively evaluate fire hazards of five kinds of rubbers based on cone calorimeter test results. Analyses showed that the order of comprehensive fire hazards of five rubbers evaluated by MAHP was the same as that evaluated by GRA, and the order of comprehensive fire hazard from small to great followed chloroprene rubber （ CR）, ethylene pro- pylene diene monomer （EPDM）, nitrile rubber （NBR）, natural rubber（NR） and butadiene rubber（BR）.

关 键 词：层次分析法 灰色关联分析 火灾危险性 锥形量热仪 橡胶生胶 

分 类 号：X928.7[环境科学与工程—安全科学]