自制抑或拓展:补贴法律专向性判断的新问题  

Self-Restraint or Expand:The Analysis Boundary on De Jure Specificity of Subsidy

作　　者：李仲平[1] LI Zhong-ping(School of Law, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

机构地区：[1]广东金融学院法律系,广东广州510521

出　　处：《上海对外经贸大学学报》2017年第5期5-13,共9页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

基　　金：2012年国家社科基金一般项目(12BFX139)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：《补贴与反补贴措施协议》将法律专向性的分析边界限定于争议所涉措施。但当争议所涉措施构成另外一项更为宽泛的、整体补贴计划的一部分时,法律专向性的分析边界应拓展至较为宽泛的、整体补贴计划。基于专向性判断应在多边贸易体制的贸易目标和成员方合理的政策主张之间维持平衡,法律专向性分析边界的拓展,应在《补贴与反补贴措施协议》第2条第4款的约束之下,借鉴美国反补贴法中的"完整联系检测法",用肯定性证据予以明确证明。The Agreement of Subsidy and Countervailing Measures limit the analysis boundary of de jure specificity to measures in question. However, when measures at issue constitute a part of another generally available and whole subsidy program, the analysis boundary of de jure specificity should be expanded to a broader and overall subsidy program. Because the standard of specificity should form an balance between the trade target of multilateral trading system and the reasonable policy proposals of WTO member, the expanding on the analysis boundary of de jure specificity should refer to the completing contact tests in the U.S and be clearly demonstrated according to the Article 2 （4） of the Agreement of Subsidy And Countervailing Measures.

关 键 词：法律专向性 补贴 反补贴 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学] DF961[政治法律—国际法学]