检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张睿君[1] ZHANG Rui-jun(University of International Relations, Beijing 100091, China)
机构地区:[1]国际关系学院公共市场与政府采购研究所,北京100091
出 处:《上海对外经贸大学学报》2017年第5期14-24,65,共12页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
摘 要:2007年中国提交加入WTO《政府采购协议》的首份出价,经过与参加方的多轮谈判,至今已提交了6份出价,但谈判仍未结束。对于参加方而言,中国蕴含着巨大的政府采购市场;对于中国而言,GPA意味着可以开拓的国际政府采购市场。政府采购具有节约政府支出和实现政策目标的功效,加入GPA是事关国家利益的重要问题,因此谈判历时9年之久,中国和参加方都未轻易妥协。本文梳理了中国6份出价和谈判焦点,从国家利益的角度对中国加入GPA谈判做出分析。In 2007, China submitted its first offer to join the Government Procurement Agreement of WTO, and after six rounds of negotiations with the participants, six offers have been submitted, but the negotiations have not yet ended. For the participants, China has a huge government procurement market; for China, GPA means a more open international government procurement market. Government procurement has the effect of saving government expenditure and achieving policy objectives. Joining GPA is an important issue which will affect national interests. Therefore, China and the participants did not easily compromise to each other, though the negotiations had already took nine years. This paper show six Chinese offers and the focus of negotiation, and analyse the national interests of China's entry into the GPA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127