有关宋末泉州蒲氏史料的几个疑点  

Questions on the Sources of the Quanzhou’s Pu Family in the Late Song Period

作　　者：刘迎胜[1] Liu Yingsheng(Institute of Asian Studies, Nanjing Universit)

机构地区：[1]中国南海研究协同创新中心南京大学元史研究室/民族与边疆研究中心

出　　处：《元史及民族与边疆研究集刊》2015年第2期12-24,共13页Studies on the Mongol-Yuan and China's Bordering Area

摘　　要：近半个世纪以来，学界在研究在东西海上交通史与中国伊斯兰文化史中占有重要地位的宋末泉州蒲氏家族时，陆续使用了四种新史料，即文莱的蒲公之墓碑铭、清代泉州《西山杂志》残抄本、存世之《泉州蒲氏族谱》与1998年成都市东北郊发现的北宋宋京夫人蒲氏墓志铭。其中第一种与最后一种，因系墓碑与墓志，最为可靠，本文以此二者为据，核查《西山杂志》与《蒲氏族谱》的相关记载，得出《蒲氏族谱》与《西山杂志》有关蒲寿庚家族的记载均不能视为可信史料的结论，而蒲公之墓与蒲寿庚之间的关系仍存疑问。 《宋史·瀛国公纪》称蒲寿庚：“提举泉州舶司，擅蕃舶利者三十年。”本文从蒲寿庚曾经担任的“制斡”官职人手，认为此职即“沿海制置使司斡办公事官”，后来晋升为制置使。Scholars have used four new materials when discussing the Quanzhou＇s Pu 蒲 Family of the Late Song, which plays an important role in the histories of East-West communication and Islam in China, namely the stele of tomb of Master Pu 蒲公之墓 found in Brunei, a fragment manuscript of book entitled Xishan Zazhi 西山杂志, of the Qing, a genealogy of Pu family 蒲氏族谱 and the inscription of the tombstone of Mrs. Pu, the wife of Song Jing 蒲氏墓志 excavated in 1998 in Chengdu. Based on the first and latest, which are both tombstones and are reliable, checking the related records of the Xishan Zazhi and the genealogy, the paper concludes that Xishan Zazhi and the genealogy of the Pu family can not be treated as reliable sources. In addition, Songshi宋史 described Pu Shougeng蔳寿庚 was the head of the customs of Quanzhou 提举泉州舶司and sought b enefits of foreign trade 擅蕃舶利for 30 years. Thepaper discussed the position of Zhigan制干 which Pu Shougeng had had, and believes thatthe original name of his position Zhigan should be an official of Ganban Gongshi 干办公事情in Yankai Zhizkl Skisi沿海制署使司 , and later he was promoted to ZhizhiShi制置使 , the headof this office.

关 键 词：蒲寿庚 海外交通 伊斯兰文化 蕃商 制斡 

分 类 号：K2[历史地理—历史学]