激素替代治疗围绝经期植物神经失调临床对照研究  被引量:2

Clinical comparative study of hormone replacement therapy for vegetative nervous function disturbances in the perimenopausal period

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘天旭 

机构地区:[1]镇平县妇幼保健院,河南镇平474250

出  处:《中国实用神经疾病杂志》2017年第15期92-93,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases

摘  要:目的分析激素替代治疗围绝经期植物神经失调的效果。方法选取2015-01—2017-01我院收治的围绝经期植物神经失调患者120例,随机分为2组各60例,对照组使用植物神经调节药物联合镇静药治疗,实验组使用激素替代治疗,对比2组治疗效果及不良反应发生情况。结果实验组总体有效率88.33%,对照组为75.00%,2组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组乳腺增生发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),头痛、浮肿、小腹胀痛发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论围绝经期植物神经失调采用激素替代疗法相比植物神经调节药物联合镇静药治疗具有更好的效果。Objective To analyze the etfect of hormone replacement therapy for vegetative nervous function disturbances in gynaecology and obstetrics perimenopausal period.Methods From January 2015 to January 2017,120 cases with vegetative nervous function disturbances of diagnostic condition were selected.These cases were divided into two groups and 60 cases in each group.Plant neuromodulation drugs and sedative were used in the control group,while hormone replacement therapy was used in the experimental group.And we analyzed the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions cases in the two groups.Results In the control group,the treatment efficiency was 88.33%,which was 75.00% in the experimental group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.05).The reaction of hyperplasia of the two groups had statistically significant(P 0.05).Besides,headache,edema,lower abdominal pain and distension condition of the two groups had no statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion For the patients with vegetative nervous function disturbances in the perimenopausal period,hormone replacement therapy has better effect than plant neuromodulation drugs and sedative treatment.

关 键 词:围绝经期 植物神经失调 激素替代疗法 

分 类 号:R711.51[医药卫生—妇产科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象