高度危险责任的规制进路——兼评《侵权责任法》第69条、第72条及第73条  

Regulation of Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities——Review of section 69,section 72 and section 73 of Tort Law

作　　者：唐超[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学法学系,北京100069

出　　处：《河北法学》2017年第10期65-79,共15页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2012年度国家社科基金一般项目<侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究>(12BFX083)

摘　　要：对危险责任的规制,以非穷尽列举加上小的一般条款为宜。高度危险责任的一般条款与诸如《侵权责任法》第7条这样的指导性条款隐含冲突。对"高度危险"这个不确定概念,应以例示方式或说明性法条加以束缚。危险物责任与危险活动责任没有区别规制的必要。相较《民法通则》第123条,由《侵权责任法》第69条、第72条、第73条构成的高度危险责任规整,不能算是成功的改造。The appropriate approach to regulate strict liability is ＂non-exhaustive listing ＋ a little general clause ＂. General clause of liability for damages resulting from abnormally dangerous activities is inconsistent with provisions such as section 7 of Tort Law. The uncertain concept of ＂ abnormally dangerous activities＂ should be constructed according examples listed by legislatures or descriptive clause. There is no need to distinguish liabilities for damages resulting from dangerous substances or dangerous activities. Compared to section 123 of General Rule of Civil Law, the new regulation consisted of section 69, section 72 and section 73 of Tort Law is not a SUCCESS work,

关 键 词：高度危险 一般条款 危险作业 危险物 危险活动 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]