再议过失危险犯——兼论事故类犯罪危险犯的设立  

Reconsideration of the Negligent Dangerous Crimes——On the establishment of dangerous crime of accident crime

作　　者：贺国荣[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120 [2]四川农业大学,四川成都611130

出　　处：《河北法学》2017年第10期160-172,共13页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：德日等域外国家已有过失危险犯之刑事立法,其刑法学界议题已从过失危险犯可否设立之应然问题转为司法实务之该当解释。我国学界依然处在可否设立之讨论阶段,该问题之解决路径可分为两个层面:理论层面和事实现状。从刑法学理层面讲,犯罪之成立包括主观罪过和客观危害(含行为之危险性),法益破坏之危险状态与实害结果同属于客观危害之行为结果,过失与故意同样具有主观之可谴责性,且过失犯之可罚性重在客观危害,危险状态其对法益之破坏不亚于实害结果,因此在理论层面过失危险犯是完全可以成立的。结合其他学科对我国安全生产事故之系统性的实证调研数据,纵向趋势虽有所改观,但是横向比较依然严峻,现今行政体制及经济发展政策的背景下,基于行政执法不严、实效不佳的前提,事故类犯罪危险犯之设立有其必要性。Germany, Japan and other foreign countries have committed the crime of negligent dangerous criminal legislation, the subject of the criminal law has been from the possibility of the establishment of the crime can be converted to the judicial practice should be explained. The academic circles in our country are still in the stage of discussion which can be set up, and the solution of the problem can be divided into two levels： theoretical and factual. From the criminal law theory, the crime was established including subjective and objective harm （including dangerous behavior, risk of） failure state law and harmful results belong to the same objective harm behavior, negligence and intentional subjective equally reprehensible, and negligence of punishment on objective harm the destruction of the dangerous state, the legal interest of less harmful results, so in theory the negligent dangerous crimes can be established, in combination with other disciplines of empirical research data on the system of China^s production safety accident of the vertical trend has been improved, but the comparison is still grim, in the current system and development policy under the background of the premise of administrative law enforcement is not strict, the effectiveness of the poor, the crime of dangerous accident crime has its necessity.

关 键 词：过失危险犯 事故类犯罪 危险 刑事立法 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]