检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄威 牛若芸 HUANG Wei NIU Ruoyun(National Meteorological Centre, Beiiing 100081)
机构地区:[1]国家气象中心,北京100081
出 处:《气象》2017年第9期1110-1116,共7页Meteorological Monthly
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2012CB417204);国家科技支撑计划(2015BAC03B02);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0402702)共同助资
摘 要:本文基于欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)和美国国家环境预报中心(NCEP)集合预报资料和支持向量机(SVM)回归方法建立了多模式集成的动力-统计客观预报模型(SVM-多模式集成预报),继而选用2012年5—9月(共计153 d)发生在淮河流域及其以南地区的大雨和暴雨开展了回报试验,并将所得预报结果与ECMWF的控制预报和集合平均预报进行了多角度比对评估。结果表明:在中期预报时效(4~7 d),SVM-多模式集成预报方法对2012年5—9月大雨和暴雨的预报效果最优,尤其对暴雨预报准确率明显提高,其优势主要体现在对强降雨中心分布范围和强度的预报更接近实况。This paper establishes a multi-mode integrated dynamic-statistical objective forecast model (SVM multi-model integration forecast) based on the European Centres for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Center (NCEP) ensemble forecast data and support vector machine regression method, then carries out a forecast test for heavy rain process that occurred in the Huaihe River Basin and its south of China during the period from May to September in 2012, and finally the forecast results are compared with the control forecast and ensemble average forecast of ECMWF. The results show that in the medium-term forecasting time-scale (4--7 days), the SVM multi-model integrated forecast method is the best for forecasting heavy rain compared with the control forecast of the ECMWF and the ensemble average forecast during the period from May to September in 2012. Especially for the accuracy of rainstorm forecasting, it is more effective, and the advantage is that its forecast of the distribution and intensity of heavy rain is closer to the observation.
分 类 号:P456[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222