大国决策还是平等协商——后巴黎时代全球气候决策机制面临的选择  

Great Power Decision-Making or Consultation on the Basis of Equality:The Post-Paris Choice Faced by the Global Climate Decision Mechanism

作　　者：董勤[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京信息工程大学,南京210044

出　　处：《阅江学刊》2017年第3期45-52,共8页Yuejiang Academic Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"气候变化问题安全化的国际趋势及中国外交对策研究"(11BGJ035)

摘　　要：安理会"大国一致"决策机制所形成的方案不能体现所有国家在气候变化问题上的合理利益需求,无助于推动全球气候治理进一步深入开展。《巴黎协定》所确定的目标十分具有挑战性,仅仅依靠大国的力量无法实现,其有效实施需要世界各国共同努力。平等协商机制通过平等对话、沟通与协调这种自下而上的方式,把国际社会成员的合理利益需求汇集起来,形成能够反映全球共同利益的谈判成果,有助于《巴黎协定》各缔约方减少观念分歧,增加共同行动意愿,促进全球气候治理在《巴黎协定》所确立的框架下有效实施。Schemes upholding 'The principle of unanimity' decision-making mechanismby the UN Security Council fails to involve reasonable interests demand of all the countries onthe issue of climate change, making no contribution to promote further development of globalclimate governance. The targets set in the Paris Agreement are rather challenging and can onlybe effectively achieved by the joint efforts of all the countries, while simply relying on thestrength of great powers can only lead to failure. Through the bottom-up mode of equal dialogue,communication and negotiation, the mechanism of consultation on the basis of equality putstogether reasonable interest demand of members of International community, giving birth tonegotiation results reflecting common interests of the globe. It helps to reduce conceptualdisagreements of contracting parties of the Paris Agreement, enhance the willingness ofconcerted action and promote the effective implementation of global climate governance underthe framework of the Paris Agreement.

关 键 词：《巴黎协定》 大国决策 平等协商 全球气候治理 后巴黎时代 

分 类 号：D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] P467[政治法律—经济法学]