略论美籍华裔史家对建国初马克思主义史学的评价及其思考——以“中国近代史资料丛刊”的评述为考察中心  

Chinese American Historians' Evaluation and Reflections on Marxist Historiography in the Early Years of New China

作　　者：吴原元 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学马克思主义学院,上海200241

出　　处：《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》2017年第4期30-36,共7页Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"民国史家与美国汉学:以1940年代移居美国的中国史家为考察中心"(12CZS004)

摘　　要：为建构马克思主义的中国近代史学研究体系,新中国史学会组织编纂了"中国近代史资料丛刊"。对这套资料丛刊,旅居美国的中国史家高度关注。在他们看来,这套资料丛刊虽存在过于强调马克思主义意识形态、外文史料收录存在严重欠缺等局限性,但总体上具有不可替代的重要学术价值。旅美中国史家的评述告诉我们,新中国初期的马克思主义史学虽被诬称为"意识形态化的学术",然并非毫无学术价值。事实上,这一时期虽是一个学术为政治服务的时代,但它同时亦可理解为史家以积极姿态介入现实需要的时代,这种基于现实需要出发的研究,既是史家时代精神的一种体现,同时他们的研究亦蕴含有一定的学术价值。In order to establish a Marxist system of historical research on modern China, New China Historical Society compiled a series of historical materials about modern Chinese history. This series of books drew the close attention of Chinese American historians. In their view, this series of collections had many limitations, such as too much emphasis on Marxist ideology and the lack of foreign materials. However, they thought that it has important academic value as a whole. Review of American Chinese historians told us that Marxist historiography in the early years of new China was falsely regarded as the ＂academic study of ideology＂, but it was not without academic value. In fact, this period is an era of academic service for politics, but it can also be interpreted as the era of historians getting involved in real society with a positive attitude. This research based on the needs of reality is not only a reflection of the historians＇ spirit of the age, but also contains certain academic value.

关 键 词：美籍华裔史家 马克思主义史学 中国近代史资料丛刊 评述 

分 类 号：K207.8[历史地理—历史学]