检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李莉娟
机构地区:[1]西南大学文学院,重庆400715
出 处:《当代修辞学》2017年第5期35-44,共10页Contemporary Rhetoric
基 金:教育部人文社科一般项目"符号学巴黎学派的语言哲学思想研究"(14YJC720011)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:目前意义研究依然处于众说纷纭的状态,而这种纷乱归根结底主要是由意义与指称、意义的存在层与现象层、意义之对象语言与元语言的层次这三对关系的纠缠引起的。本文试图阐释这三对概念之间的关系。本文的具体思路为:1)进一步区分意义与指称,明确意义研究的对象与语言的指称对象无关,意义只关乎语言自身;2)根据索绪尔语言与言语的区分将意义分为存在层与现象层两个层面,确立意义分层研究的方法论原则;3)借助现代逻辑学,区分意义的逻辑层次。对象语言就是研究的语言对象,元语言不仅是用于研究意义的语言工具,也是对意义的呈现。这三对关系的澄清是使得意义研究道路明晰化的基本区分。The studies of meaning currently are still in a controversial state, which is primarily due to the confusion on three pairs of tangled relations, i.e., meaning and reference, existence layer and phenomenon layer of meaning, object-language level and meta-language level of meaning. This article attempts to concepts. And it is unfolded as follows: The indicates that the object of meaning studies clarify the relations between the three pairs of further distinction between meaning and reference has nothing to do with the referent of language,and meaning is only about language itself. According to Saussure's distinction between'langue' and 'parole' this article establishes the methodological principle of the study onmeaning, namely, the existence layer/phenomenon layer distinction. With the help of modernLogic, it distinguishes the logical levels of meaning, i.e., the level of object-language and thelevel of meta-language. The object-language is the language object in research, and themeta-language is not only the research tools for meaning, but also the manifestation ofmeaning. Therefore the clarification of the three pairs of relations throws light on the meaningresearches in a fundamental way.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222