国际性与主体性:中日冲突和国际联盟调查团的产生  

Internationalism and Subjectivity:The Sino-Japanese Confliction and the Origin of the Commission of the League of Nations

作　　者：陈海懿 郭昭昭[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学历史学院 [2]江苏科技大学人文社科学院

出　　处：《抗日战争研究》2017年第3期58-74,共17页Studies of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression

基　　金：国家社科基金抗日战争研究专项工程"李顿调查团档案翻译与研究"(16KZD017);国家留学基金委资助(201606190076)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：九一八事变爆发后,中国将此事诉诸国际社会,希望国际联盟伸张正义,结果是国际联盟决定组建调查团,赴远东调查中日冲突。一般研究将调查团置于九一八事变后的叙述框架内,强调调查过程和调查报告书,对调查团的产生过程缺乏整体研究。在国联调查团产生问题上,中国不仅与日本在国联进行了长达三个月的论争,而且强烈呼吁英美等国支持组建调查团,各国之间的交锋异常频繁。以国联行政院第65届常会的三个阶段为时间线索,以中日围绕是否派遣调查团的辩论为叙述脉络,系统呈现国联调查团的产生过程,可以凸显中日冲突的"国际性"和国联调查团的"主体性"。After the outbreak of the September Eighteenth Incident,China appealed it to international arena,expecting the League of Nations to serve justice. As a result,the League of Nations decided to build a commission to investigate the SinoJapanese conflict in the Far East. The past studies have put the Commission in a framework of post September Eighteenth Incident narratives,and paid more attentions to investigation process and the final report,lacking total researches to the Commission's origination process. In fact China and Japan disputed for 3 months on the problem in the League of Nations,and also strongly appealed the Britain,the USA and other countries to support its building,and clashes between different countries were unusually frequent. Taking the three stages of the 65 thregular meeting of the Executive of the League of Nations as narrative line and the disputes over the dispatch of the Commission between China and Japan as narrative context,this article systematically discloses the origination process of the Commission. This can highlight the'internationalism'of the Sino-Japanese conflict and the'subjectivity'of the Commission of the League of Nations.

关 键 词：国际联盟 国联调查团 九一八事变 中日冲突 

分 类 号：K264[历史地理—历史学]