检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学卫生管理学院,广东广州511436
出 处:《中国医学伦理学》2017年第10期1223-1227,共5页Chinese Medical Ethics
摘 要:目的通过对国内外医疗纠纷第三方调解模式的对比研究,探讨我国医疗纠纷第三方调解模式运行机制存在的问题并提出改善建议。结果我国医疗纠纷人民调解机制存在调解人才缺乏、宣传力度不足、调解结果难以履行、调解支持经费难以保证等问题。结论建议提高员工薪酬待遇,规范员工选拔制度;加大宣传力度,提高公众知晓度;完善司法确认制度,增强协议保证性;节约调节成本,增加多方筹资渠道。Objective: To discuss the problems that exist in the operation mechanism of the third - party media- tion mode of medical disputes in China and put forward suggestions for improvement, through comparative study of the third - party mediation mode of domestic and foreign medical disputes. Results: People' s mediation mechanism of medical disputes in our country still hadsome problems. For example, mediation talents were insufficient; propa- ganda was inadequate; mediation results were difficult to implement;mediation support funds couldn' t be guaran- teed, and so on. Conclusion:It is recommended to improve the remuneration of employees and standardize the staff selection system; increase propaganda and raise public awareness; improve the judicial confirmation system and en- hance the guarantee of agreement ; save regulation cost and increase multi - financing channels.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3