检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘翠 LIU Cui(Department of emergency, Dezhou hospital of traditional chinese medicine, Shandong 25300)
机构地区:[1]德州市中医院急诊科护理,山东德州253000
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2017年第19期15-16,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨在对儿科患者急诊抢救过程中优化护理服务流程对抢救效果和护理质量的影响.方法:选取2013年12月~2014年12月行常规护理流程的65例急诊患儿作为对照组,选取2015年1月~2016年1月优化后62例急诊患儿作为观察组,对比2组患者的抢救效率、患者家属对护理质量评价情况.结果:观察组患儿抢救成功率为91.94%,家属对护理满意度为95.16%,对照组数据依次为78.64%、89.23%,数据对比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组患儿就诊等待时间、诊疗时间均短于对照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论:在儿科急诊抢救过程中对护理服务流程进行优化,能够提升抢救效率、改善护理质量,因此非常值得临床上推广使用.Objective: To explore the effect of nursing service flow on emergency treatment and nursing quality in the emergency treat- ment of pediatric patients. Methods: Routine nursing procedures (from December 2013 to 2014 December) 65 eases of emergency pa- tients as control group, select the optimized (January 2015 -2016 January) 62 cases of emergency patients as the observation group, compared two groups of patients with the rescue efficiency, evaluation of nursing quality of patients" families. Results: The observation group with the success rate was 91.94%, the family of nursing satisfaction was 95.16%, the control group data were 78.64%, 89.23%, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the observation group with the waiting time for treatment, treatment time was shorter than the control group, there was statistically significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: In the pediatric emergency rescue process of nursing service process optimization can improve the rescue efficiency, improve the quality of care, so it isworth to promote the use of clinical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.114