检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门海事法院宁德法庭,福建宁德352100 [2]厦门海事法院海事庭,福建厦门361000
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2017年第3期68-75,共8页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:在中国法律框架下,由于外派机构的强制性介入,外派海员劳务实践中存在多个合同关系,当力量悬殊各方博弈后呈现在不同合同中的同一客体出现了不同归属时,面对海员基本权益保障与外派服务行业生存间的平衡,司法应作出怎样的回应?从审判实践中发现的问题入手,立足海员外派实践中的合同关系和法律规制,剖析博弈各方的立场角度和供需现实,探讨外派海员劳务合同中"社会福利费"的法律定性问题,并提出相应的对策和建议。Within the legal framework of China,there are normally more than one contract in one dispatched seafarer recruitmen because of the legally conformed interference of seafarer dispatching service agencies. When the same benefit is appointed to different parties in different contracts as the result of uneven negotiating powers,how can the judicature make a balance between the basic rights of the seafarers and the vital interests of dispatching service agencies? Starting from the question arisen in a judicial case,this paper attempts to discuss the legal definition of "social welfare",by elaborating contractual relationships and mandatory legal provisions in seafarers dispatching recruitments,and by analysing the different standpoints of the parties and their supply and demand reality in practice. In the end,some suggestions are made.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33