检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2017年第3期76-84,共9页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:针对司法实践中船员劳务(劳动)合同项下人身伤亡赔偿纠纷案件的争议问题,一方面,分析"应然"视角下船员劳务(劳动)合同项下人身伤亡赔偿纠纷案件的法律关系识别、法律适用及责任竞合等问题;另一方面,立足于现行法,提出司法实践中通过主体认定来识别法律关系并判断法律适用的一般观点,并根据"应然"视角下工伤保险赔偿责任与侵权损害赔偿责任竞合问题的处理原则,提出通过对法律规范进行目的解释和扩大解释以平衡当事人利益的司法建议。The main disputes arising from personal injury and death compensation cases under crew employment contracts in legal practice are first deliberated in this article. On the one hand,this article analyzes the identification of legal relationship,the law application and the concurrent liability issues regarding personal injury and death compensation cases under crew employment contracts from an ideal perspective. On the other hand,basing on the current laws,it is proposed that the identification of legal relationships and the choosing of which law to apply should be done through the identification of subjects in the legal practice. Further,according to the principles in solving the concurrent liability between employment injury insurance and tort from an ideal perspective,it is recommended that teleological interpretation and amplified interpretation should be used to interpret the legal provisions so as to balance the interests of the disputing parties.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229