检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学外国语学院,山东青岛266100
出 处:《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第5期105-111,共7页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
摘 要:本研究主要探讨了口头与书面同伴反馈对中国大学生英语作文语言准确性的影响。研究历时16周,以两个班级共61名大二学生为被试,其中一个班的30名学生参与书面同伴反馈活动,为书面组;另一个班的31名学生为口头组,参与口头同伴反馈活动。对前测与后测的数据进行分析后发现:(1)口头和书面同伴反馈中,哪一种更能显著提高学生的写作准确性还需要进一步研究;(2)在两种反馈中,被试都能提出正确、有效的反馈,且大部分反馈意见能被同伴采用。本研究为中国英语写作教学提供了某些启示。This study explores the influences that oral and written peer feedback may have on the language accuracy of Chinese college students' English writings.Two classes of second-year college students(with a total number of 61)were selected as subjects and participated in an experiment that lasted for 16 weeks and in which one class,designated as the oral group,took part in oral peer feedback activities while the other class,the written group,took part in written peer feedback activities only.The analysis of their performance in the pretest and posttest shows that no significant difference is found between oral and written peer feedback in the effectiveness of improving the students' writing accuracy,which means further research is needed.The study also shows that the participants of both groups are able to make useful and correct comments,a majority of which are accepted in their peers' revisions.The results of this study have some implications for the teaching of English writing in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173