检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范盼盼[1] 谢瑞芝[1] 明博[1] 李姚姚 王克如[1] 侯鹏[1] 李少昆[1] FAN Pan-pan XIE Rui-zhi MING Bo LI Yao-yao WANG Ke-ru HOU Peng LI Shao-kun(Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agrictdtural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Beifing 100081, China)
机构地区:[1]中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业部作物生理生态重点实验室,北京10081
出 处:《玉米科学》2017年第5期68-72,共5页Journal of Maize Sciences
基 金:科技部"973"计划项目(2015CB150401);国家自然科学基金(31271663)
摘 要:以先玉335为试验材料,在37 500株/hm^2和67 500株/hm^2密度下测定不同叶位叶片的叶面积和光合有效辐射。从玉米冠层顶部到基部,叶片的光合生产能力呈单峰不对称曲线分布,最大值出现在顶4~6叶,两个密度下表现一致。不同叶位叶片的光合生产能力存在较大差别,在37 500株/hm^2和67 500株/hm^2的条件下,棒三叶(顶7~9)叶面积分别占群体的28.74%和29.11%,其光合生产能力分别占群体的29.60%和29.04%;棒三叶上部的3个叶片(顶4~6)的叶面积分别占群体的25.74%和25.12%,光合生产能力分别占群体的36.27%和40.57%;棒三叶下部的基部叶片分别占群体叶面积32.74%和35.23%,光合生产能力仅占群体的13.90%和9.79%。研究证实,由于冠层结构的不同造成冠层中光分布的差别,影响不同叶位叶片光合效率,导致其光合生产能力的差异。构建合理的群体冠层结构,不仅需要关注叶片的空间分布,更应该重视对冠层光合生产能力的分析。By using Xianyu335 as test material, leaf area and photosynthetically active radiation of leaves at different leaf positions were measured at 37 500 plant/ha and 67 500 plant/ha. The results showed that the photosynthetic capacity of leaf from the top to the bottom of maize canopy showed a single peak asymmetric curve distribution, the maximum value appeared in the top 4 to 6 leaves under both of the two densities. Further analysis show that the photosynthetic capacity of leaves at different leaf positions varied greatly. Under the condition of planting densities of 37 500 plants/ha and 67 500 plants/ha, the leaf areas of leaves around the ear(7-9) accounted for 28.74% and 29.04%, the photosynthetic capacity accounted for 29.60% and 29.11% respectively. The leaf areas of the top three leaves above the ear(4-6) were 25.74% and 25.12%, respectively, and the photosynthetic capacity accounted for 36.27% and 40.57% of the total population. The leaf areas of the leaves under the ear accounted for 32.74% and 35.23%, respectively, while the photosynthetic capacity only accounted for 13.90% and 9.79% of the total population. The results showed that the photosynthetic efficiency of different leaf positions was affected by the difference of canopy structure, which led to the difference of photosynthetic productivity. The results also showed that to construct the reasonable canopy structure should not only pay attention to the spatial distribution of leaves, but also pay more attention to the analysis of canopy function - photosynthetic production capacity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195