西方政府绩效评估兴起的意识形态基础及其在我国的误用--对“意识形态终结论”的批判  

The Ideological Basis of Western Government Performance Evaluation and How It is Misused in China:A Critique of the End of Ideology

作　　者：尚虎平[1,2] Shang Huping(School of Public Administration of Soochow University, Suzho)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院/江苏省新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心 [2]南开大学中国政府与政策联合研究中心

出　　处：《经济社会体制比较》2017年第5期146-156,共11页Comparative Economic & Social Systems

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“我国县级政府潜绩评估研究”(项目编号:14BGL115);江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队“地方政府与社会治理”(项目编号:2015ZSTD010)

摘　　要：我国地方政府以"工具哲学"思维直接照搬西方的政府绩效评估,虽然曾有力地促进了地方经济发展,但唯GDP式的评价方式,逐渐偏离了政府为人民服务的"初心"。这源于我国在引进政府绩效评估时并未洞察它本身源于"晚期资本主义"萌生的一种"成绩社会"、"绩效社会"意识形态,其生发的目的是为"晚期资本主义"既有格局进行辩护。这种辩护性使得它仅仅是一种符号性、象征性的管理工具,并不以促进人民群众利益、地位的改进为目标。要根除这种源生性问题,就需要将政府绩效切实融入我国社会主义国家本质。Based on instrumental philosophy, Chinese local governments have imitated the way Western govern- ments evaluate their performance. Ahhough this has greatly promoted their local economic and social development, its negative effects are felt these days. The most notorious aspect lies in the worship of GDP that leads lo- cal governments to a crooked path on which they do not work to serve the people. In fact, government perform- ance evaluation rose as a result of ＂performance society＂ ideology defending the existing capitalist class structure, interests, and income distribution. The imitation on Western government performance evaluation has also given rise to the problem of ideological symbolism. In response, the Chinese governments have to blend socialist characteristics into performance evaluations.

关 键 词：政府绩效评估 绩效社会 意识形态 辩护性 社会主义 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]