基于TOPSIS法的运动员攻防能力指标评价研究  

Research on Evaluation of the Athletes' offense and Defense Ability Based on the TOPSIS Method

作　　者：张良志[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安医学院,西安710021

出　　处：《长春理工大学学报（自然科学版）》2017年第4期138-142,共5页Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：西安医学院2016年配套基金项目(2016PT30)

摘　　要：运用TOPSIS分析法对2016年里约奥运会中国队与对手攻防能力指标进行定量分析,为中国男篮训练提供评价标准。研究认为,在进攻能力方面,美国队、澳大利亚队和法国队的进攻Ci值超过了0.5,属于进攻能力较强的队伍;而委内瑞拉、塞尔维亚和中国队的进攻Ci值则低于0.5,进攻能力相对较为弱一些。在防守能力方面,美国队、澳大利亚队、法国队、委内瑞拉、塞尔维亚和中国队的防守Ci值均超过了0.5,属于防守能力较强的队伍。美国队、澳大利亚队和法国队的攻防Ci值均超过了0.5,属于综合实力较强的队伍;而委内瑞拉、塞尔维亚和中国队的攻防Ci值均在0.5以下,攻防能力相对较弱。The index of athletes＇ offense and defense ability of Chinese team and the opponents was quantitatively analyzedby using TOPSIS analysis method forthe 2016 Rio Olympic Games. The evaluation criteria for Chinese men＇s basketball team training were provided. Studies suggest that the United States,Australia and France teams＇ offensive Ci values were more than 0.5 in terms of offensive ability,which belonged to the teams with strong offensive ability. Venezuela,Serbia and Chinese teams＇ affensive Civalues were below 0.5,their offensive abilities were relatively weak. In terms of defensive ability,the United States,Australia,France,Venezuela,Serbia and Chinese teams＇ defensive Ci values were more than 0.5,which belonged to the teams with strong defensive ability. The United States,Australiaand France teams＇ offensive and defensive Civalueswere more than 0.5,which belonged to the teams with strong comprehensive strength. And Venezuela,Serbia and Chinese teams＇ offensive and defensive Ciwere under 0.5 and their defense abilities were relatively weak.

关 键 词：里约奥运会 篮球 攻防指标 TOPSIS 

分 类 号：G841[文化科学—体育训练]