新国体下的旧史学——民国初年的宣付清史馆立传(1914—1927)  

The Old Historiography in the New Regime—— Writing Biographies in the Qing Historiographer's Institute in the Early Republican Era (1914—1927)

作　　者：蔡炯昊 Cai Jionghao

机构地区：[1]四川大学历史文化学院,专职博士后四川成都610065

出　　处：《学术月刊》2017年第10期162-177,共16页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：辛亥革命后,清代覆亡,绵延两千余年的帝制亦随之终结。在新国体之下,如何书写刚刚过去的清代历史,成为各方势力博弈的一个场域。1914年,民国政府设立清史馆,开始纂修清史,帝制时代宣付史馆立传的机制亦随之延续。在清史馆存在的十余年间,共有数十件宣付清史馆立传的案例。检视这些案例,可以窥见各方如何通过宣付清史馆立传机制来形塑清代末年特别是辛亥鼎革之际的历史记忆。与此同时,新旧政治理念、家族名誉、族群认同、朋友情谊等等因素也交织在这些案例之中。在近代中国的"过渡时代",旧史学实践在新国体之下仍然具有多重意义。With the Revolution of 1911 and the fall of the Qing Dynasty, the traditional monarchy mat spanned for over two thousand years was terminated. In the new regime, how to narrate and understand the previous Qing Dynasty has become an arena fought by various political powers. In 1914, the Government established the Qing Historiographer＇s Institute （＂清史馆＂） to start the compiling of the history of the Qing Dynasty. Writing biographies, a remaining system of the era of monarchy, continued to exist. During the existence of the Qing Historiographer＇s Institute, there were dozens of cases of biographies written in more than ten years. To examine these cases, one is able to observe how various powers tried to shape the late Qing Dynasty, especially the historical memory of the Revolution in 1911, by utilizing the system of writing biographies. Factors such as new and old political ideas, clan reputations, ethnic identities, friendships, etc. are intertwined in these respective cases. In the ＂transitional period＂ of modern China, the old historiography still has multiple meanings in the new regimes.

关 键 词：清史馆 历史书写 民国初年 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]