全国古籍普查登记平台古籍分类义理探析——与四库分类法相比  

Exploration of the Giri of Ancient Books Classification on National Ancient Books' Investigation and Registration Platform——Compared with the “Si Ku Quan Shu Classification”

作　　者：刘英洁 LIU Ying-jie(Chengdu Library, Chengdu 610000, China)

机构地区：[1]成都图书馆,成都610015

出　　处：《四川图书馆学报》2017年第5期79-82,共4页Journal of The Library Science Society of Sichuan

摘　　要：全国古籍普查登记平台的汉文古籍分类主要依据是此前国家古籍保护中心制定的《汉文古籍分类表》。普查平台在汉文古籍分类上大致继承了《四库全书总目》的分类方法,然而由于此次古籍普查的对象更为广泛,开发古籍普查平台系统的专家们又在结合前代目录学的分类思想和新学传入的时代背景的基础上,做了大量的修订,使得古籍普查平台的分类更为合理、科学,但其中有的改变却使得"辨章学术,考镜源流"的学术史意义丧失了,因此,这些修订还值得商榷。The investigation and registration platform＇ s Chinese Ancient Books＇ classification, which carries on the taxonomy of Si Ku Quan Shu, is mainly based on the previous ＂Classification Table of Chinese Ancient Books＂ for- mulated by the National Ancient Books Conservation Center. However, considering the growing scale of the investi- gation objects, the experts have to make a lot of modifications by combining the classification thought of the previ- ous bibliography and the background of the new learning introduced, trying to make the classification methods more reasonable and scientific. But those modifications disable the academic history＇ s significance, so the modifications is worth discussing.

关 键 词：全国古籍普查登记平台 四库分类法 分类 继承 创新 

分 类 号：G25[文化科学—图书馆学]