科技论文定量评价方法研究进展  

Research Progress of Quantitative Evaluation Methods of Scientific Papers

作　　者：齐世杰[1,2] 郑军卫 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院兰州文献情报中心,甘肃兰州730000 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2017年第10期140-144,共5页Information Studies:Theory & Application

基　　金：中国科学院"文献情报和期刊出版领域引进优秀人才计划"的研究成果;项目编号:传播字[2014]10号

摘　　要：[目的/意义]科技论文评价是科研活动评价的一项重要内容,论文评价方法的客观性和准确性对科研绩效评估有至关重要的作用。Web 2.0时代的到来与在线科研环境的新形势,为论文定量评价方法的革新创造了机遇。[方法/过程]通过梳理国内外科技论文评价相关文献,总结分析了科技论文定量评价的主要方法,包括传统文献计量评价法、网络分析法、基于Altmetrics评价法和综合评价方法,并对未来科技论文评价的发展趋势与探索方向做出展望。[结果/结论]基于科技论文交流过程的综合评价、多源异构数据聚合的科技论文评价是科技论文定量评价的发展方向,在这种趋势下,科研人员需结合语境界定和分析读者行为动机,并大力推进单篇文献质量与影响力评价系统建设。[ Purpose/significance ] Evaluation of scientific papers is an important part of the evaluation of scientific research activities. The objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation methods have a crucial influence on the evaluation of scientific research performance. The arrival of the Web 2. 0 era and the new situation of the online research environment have promoted the development of the quantitative evaluation methods of scientific papers. [ Method/process ] By combing the relevant literatures at home and abroad, this paper summarizes and analyzes the main methods of quantitative evaluation of scientific papers, including traditional bibliomet- ric evaluation method, network analysis method, evaluation method based on altmetrics and comprehensive evaluation method, and makes a prospect for the development trend and exploration direction of future scientific and technical papers evaluation. [ Result/ conclusion] The comprehensive evaluation based on the communication process of scientific papers and the evaluation of scientific papers of multi-source heterogeneous data aggregation is the development direction of quantitative evaluation of scientific paper. Under this trend, researchers should define and analyze readers＇ behavior motive according to contexts and promote the construction of quality and influence evaluation system on single paper.

关 键 词：科技论文评价 定量评价 评价方法 评价指标 补充计量学 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]