出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2017年第19期1926-1929,共4页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基 金:海南省哲学社会科学规划课题基金资助项目[HNS(YB)15-33];海南省卫生计生行业科研基金资助项目(14A200024)
摘 要:目的研究瑞芬太尼对急性重度失血性休克大鼠的肺保护作用。方法选用50只健康清洁级成年SD大鼠,随机分为模型组,假手术组和低、中、高3个剂量实验组,每组10只。模型组建立急性重度失血性休克模型大鼠,其他组在模型组的基础上静脉注射负荷剂量瑞芬太尼1μg·kg^(-1),低、中、高3个剂量实验组分别以0.2,0.6,1.2μg·kg^(-1)·min^(-1)的速率静脉输注瑞芬太尼,假手术组游离但不阻断肺门,模型组与假手术组静脉输注与高剂量实验组等量的0.9%NaCl。病理检查判断大鼠肺组织损伤情况,测定各组肺组织干/湿重比值(W/D)、丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、一氧化氮(NO)含量。结果模型组W/D、MDA、SOD、NO分别为2.97±0.17,(3.45±1.48)nmol·mg^(-1) prot,(11.73±1.78)U·mg^(-1) prot,(0.13±0.03)μmol·mg^(-1) prot,低剂量实验组分别为2.71±0.12,(2.90±1.03)nmol·mg^(-1) prot,(14.44±1.55)U·mg^(-1) prot,(0.16±0.05)μmol·mg^(-1) prot,与模型组相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。中剂量实验组W/D、MDA、SOD、NO分别为2.33±0.16,(2.29±0.72)nmol·mg^(-1) prot,(15.59±1.80)U·mg^(-1) prot,(0.19±0.05)μmol·mg^(-1) prot,高剂量实验组分别为2.08±0.07,(1.81±0.64)nmol·mg^(-1) prot,(17.47±1.10)U·mg^(-1) prot,(0.26±0.08)μmol·mg^(-1) prot,与模型组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼可通过抑制脂质过氧化,减轻肺组织损伤,对急性重度失血性休克大鼠的肺发挥保护作用。Objective To investigate the lung protection of remifentanil in rats with acute severe hemorrhagic shock( ASHS). Methods A total of 50 healthy adult SD rats were selected and randomly divided into model group,sham-operation group and low,middle,high dose test groups,10 rats in each group. Model group were ASHS model rats.Other groups were intravenous given injection with loading-dose of remifentanil 1 μg · kg^-1,then low,middle and high dose test groups were intravenous infusion with 0. 2,0. 6,1. 2 μg · kg^(-1)·min^-1 remifentanil. The lung hilus in model group and sham-operation group were dissociate without blockage, while model group and sham-operation group were infused with 0. 9% Na Cl as the same dose of high-dose test group. The injuries of lung tissues in rats were judged by pathological examination. The wet to dry weight ratio( W/D) of lungtissue,malondialdehyde( MDA),activity of superoxide dismutase( SOD),content of nitrogen oxide( NO) were detected in each group. Results The W/D,MDA,SOD,NO in model group were 2. 97 ± 0. 17,( 3. 45 ± 1. 48)nmol·mg^-1 prot,( 11. 73 ± 1. 78) U·mg^-1 prot,( 0. 13 ± 0. 03) μmol·mg^-1 prot,had no significant difference with those in low dose test group, which were 2. 71 ± 0. 12,( 2. 90 ± 1. 03) nmol · mg^-1 prot,( 14. 44 ± 1. 55)U·mg^-1 prot,( 0. 16 ± 0. 05) μmol·mg^-1 prot( all P〈0. 05). The W/D,MDA,SOD,NO in middle-dose test group were 2. 33 ± 0. 16,( 2. 29 ± 0. 72) nmol · mg^-1 prot,( 15. 59 ± 1. 80) U · mg^-1 prot,( 0. 19 ± 0. 05)μmol·mg^-1 prot,and those in high-dose test group were 2. 08 ± 0. 07,( 1. 81 ± 0. 64) nmol · mg^-1 prot,( 17. 47 ± 1. 10) U·mg^-1 prot,( 0. 26 ± 0. 08) μmol·mg^-1 prot,these indexes in middle-dose and high-dose test groups had significant difference with model group( all P〈0. 05). Conclusion Remifentanil can inhibit lipid peroxidation,reduce injury of lung tissue,so as to protect the lung of ASHS rats.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...