机构地区:[1]北京大学第三医院妇产科,100191 [2]北京大学临床流行病学研究中心,100191
出 处:《中华妇产科杂志》2017年第9期586-593,共8页Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
基 金:北京市科技重大专项首都临床特色应用与成果推广计划(Z171100001017231)
摘 要:目的分析轻中度妊娠期高血压(GHp)孕妇的孕期血压控制和维持水平对母儿结局的影响。方法收集2012年1月至2016年12月于北京大学第三医院进行产前检查并终止妊娠、资料完整的344例初始诊断为轻中度GHp的孕妇,对其临床资料进行分析。根据其孕期血压控制和维持水平(以收缩压和舒张压中较高1项分组)分为4组,(1)A组:〈130/80mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa)135例;(2)B组:(130~139)/(80~89)mmHg160例;(3)c组:(140~149)/(90—99)mmHg46例;(4)D组:(150—159)/(100~109)mmHg3例。比较4组产妇的临床特征及重度GHp、伴蛋白尿的子痫前期(PE+Upro)、重度子痫前期(sPE)以及小于胎龄儿(SGA)的发生率。正态分布的计量资料采用t检验,非正态分布的计量资料采用Kruskal.Wallis检验,计数资料采用X。检验,多因素分析采用logistic回归分析。结果(1)4组孕妇重度GHp、PE+Upro、sPE、SGA的发生率:A组孕妇重度GHp的发生率明显低于B组(P〈0.05),B组孕妇重度GHp和sPE的发生率明显低于C组(P〈0.05),D组孕妇重度GHp的发生率与A组、B组和C组分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。4组孕妇PE+Upro、SGA的发生率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。(2)使用药物降压的轻中度GHp孕妇的起始血压及母儿结局:48例使用药物降压的孕妇中,起始血压为(140~149)/(90~99)mmHg孕妇的重度GHp发生率明显低于起始血压i〉160/110mmHg者(P〈0.05),但起始血压为(140~149)/(90~99)mmHg、(150~159)/(100~109)mmHg孕妇重度GHp的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。起始血压水平与使用药物降压孕妇的PE+Upro、sPE、SGA发生率无关(P〉0.05)。(3)多因素logistic回归分析显示,药物降压孕妇的起始血压水平(OR=3.566,95%CObjective To investigate the effect of blood pressure (BP) control level on perinatal outcomes in women with mild-moderate gestational hypertension (GHp). Methods Totally, 344 women diagnosed initially as mild-moderate GHp who delivered in Peking University Third Hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 were recruited. They were divided into four groups according to the stabilized level of BP during pregnancy. (1) Group A: BP〈 130/80 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa); (2) Group B: BP ( 130-139)/ (80-89) mmHg; (3) Group C: BP (140-149)/(90-99) mmHg; (4) Group D: BP (150-159)/(100- 109) mmHg. The clinical profile and incidence of severe GHp, pre-eelampsia with proteinuria (PE+Upro), severe pre-eclampsia (sPE), small-for-gestational age (SGA) were compared among the four groups. Student t-test was preformed to normal distributive data and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to non-normally distributed variables. Chi-square test was used in count data. Logistic regression analysis was adopted for multiple-factor analysis. Results (1) The incidence of severe GHp in group A was lower than group B (P〈 0.05). The incidences of severe GHp and sPE in the group B was lower than those in group C (P〈0.05). While there was no difference in the incidence of PE+Upro and SGA among the four groups (P〉0.05). And the incidence of severe GHp in group D had no difference with group A, B, C (P〉0.05). (2) In the 48 patients who used medications to control BP, the occurence of severe GHp in those whose initial BP was (140-149)/ (90-99) mmHg was lower than those of/〉160/110 mmHg (P〈0.05). But the incidence of severe GHp had no significant difference between patients whose initial BP was (140-149)/(90-99) mmHg and patients whose initial BP was (150-159)/(100-109) mmHg (P〉0.05). The initial BP level had no impact on the incidence of PE + Upro, sPE and SGA (P〉0.05). (3) Multivariate logistic regres
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...