“良序科学”理论的科学民主化论证  

The Argument for Democratization of Science of the Theory of Well-ordered Science

作　　者：白惠仁[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,西安710049

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2017年第10期56-61,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上项目"科学民主化的哲学基础研究"(2017M610642);国家社会科学基金青年项目"科学知识的分配正义问题研究"(17CZX022)

摘　　要：大量的社会运动推动了STS学界对科学民主化的研究,这些理论或经验研究以科学知识的社会建构为基础,从而招致理性主义者的拒斥。面对科学哲学对这一问题的长期失语,基切尔的"良序科学"理论为科学民主化提供了完整的哲学论证。首先,通过实用主义的温和实在论,基切尔保留了科学对真理的客观发现作用;进而通过对纯科学及科学自治理想的批判,表明了科学应该促进更广泛的道德、社会和政治价值;而后,他将科学应当促进的价值表述为公民偏好的满足;最后,为了满足公民的集体偏好,要把科学对真理的追求放在一个民主的框架中来进行。The researches on democratization of science in the field of STS are promoted by lots of social movements, they build on and have been rejected by rationalists. Facing the fact that philosophy of science ignored this situation for a long time, Philip Kitcher philosophical argument for democratization of science in his theory ＇ Well - ordered Science＇. Firstly he reserves the position of truth via a pragmatic modest realism; then he rejects the ideal of pure science and scientific autonomy, indicates that a well - functioned mote a wider human values; he names these values as preferences of cltizen; in order to meet the collective preferences of citizen, truth should be placed in a democratic mode. social constructivism tries to provide a full in scientific discover research should pro- science＇ s pursuit of

关 键 词：科学民主化 有意义的真理 纯科学 科学自治 偏好 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]