检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴习林[1] 蔡青霖 臧维玲[1] 杨明 丁福江 朱其建[1]
机构地区:[1]上海海洋大学水产与生命学院,上海201306 [2]上海申漕特种水产开发公司,上海201516
出 处:《上海海洋大学学报》2017年第5期726-732,共7页Journal of Shanghai Ocean University
基 金:上海市虾类产业技术体系建设项目(沪农科产字[2014]第5号)
摘 要:探讨了运移式简易滤器构制、亲虾池循环水培养生物膜可行性及其硝化性能。实验以常用滤料(沸石+纤维球+生化环=30.9 kg)与塑料桶(70 L)制成两个相同简易生物滤器Ⅰ、Ⅱ,滤器置于手推车可运移于车间各处净化池水。以亲虾越冬池(4 m^3)循环水(0.231、0.138 m^3/h流量)可简便培养滤器生物膜与有效净化虾池水质。结果表明:约经17 d以循环虾池水培养生物膜获成熟,并能有效降低池水TAN、NO_2^--N浓度;实验37 d,两滤器对TAN平均去除率分别为40.23%与45.3%,对NO_2^--N为58.4%与65.1%;两滤器TAN平均去除速率分别为0.138、0.081 mg/(m^2·d),NO_2^--N平均去除速率为0.053、0.035 mg/(m^2·d)。滤器Ⅰ与Ⅱ均具较强处理TAN、NO_2^--N的硝化能力,且无显著差异(P>0.05)。This paper describes the construction of the simple moveable bio-filters. Additionally, the feasibility of biofilm developed through using tank water for raising prawn broodstock and its nitrification performance were evaluated in a recirculating system stocked with Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Common media such as zeolite,fiber ball and biochemical ring( Total weight 30. 9 kg) were put into plastic barrel( Total volume 70 L) to make a simple bio-filter. The two same bio-filters named Ⅰ and Ⅱ were used in current research that served as the recirculation filter. It should be noted that the bio-filter can be placed in a trolly transporting to any tank in aquaculture workshop to treat water. Two culture tanks were used as the main system in which Macrobrachium rosenbergii were grown as a source of waste nutrients. Tank water flowed out of overwintering ponds( 4 m^3) for broodstock and was mechanically filtered through the simple bio-filters Ⅰ( 0. 231 m^3/h) and Ⅱ( 0. 138 m^3/h) by pumps. The results showed that the biofilm can be developed after about 17 days through using tank water for raising prawn broodstock. Concentrations of TAN and NO2^--N can be effectively reduced by the simple moveable bio-filters. Resulting average removal rates were 40. 23%,45. 3% in TAN and 58. 4%,65. 1% in NO2^--N in 37 d by the two filters Ⅰ and Ⅱ. Average removal rates were 0. 138 mg,0. 081 mg TAN/( m^2·d),while 0. 053 mg,0. 035 mg NO2^--N/( m^2·d) by filtersⅠ andⅡ. The results of this study showed that filters Ⅰ and Ⅱ have high nitrification efficiency in removing TAN and NO2^--N,and no significant differences were observed between Ⅰ and Ⅱ( P〈0. 05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151