拟对象的谱系学:数字对象理论的序曲  

Genealogy of Quasi-object: Prelude for Theory of Digital Object

作　　者：蓝江[1] 刘黎[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2017年第5期47-56,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"马克思主义视野下的生命政治学批判研究"(16BZX016);国家社会科学基金重大项目"当前主要社会思潮新发展动态及其批判研究"(16ZDA101)

摘　　要：如何思考对象问题一直是哲学领域的核心问题。从启蒙早期开始,人们已经基于自然和社会的二分来思考对象,而这种二分体制下的对象实际上导致了某种特殊的"似自然物"或"拟对象"的发生,当代法国理论家塞尔和拉图尔从行动者-网络理论来架构经过不同行动元所形成的拟对象问题,但是拉图尔缺少一种总体的维度,导致他的理论成为当代的莱布尼茨主义。相反,西蒙东从关联环境下的对象的个体化和具体化来引申出现代技术对象的问题。这样,拉图尔和西蒙东从不同的侧面为我们去思考今天的诸多数字对象提供了重要的理论基础,在这个意义上,必须将数字对象同时视为一种行动者网络中的转化器和关联环境下的个体化,将其作为一种新型的拟对象,我们才可能理解数字对象的独特性。It is significant to consider objects. From the early enlightenment movement,we began to consider objects on the basis of nature-society dichotomy,from which some singular＂quasi-natural＂and＂quasi-object＂generated. Serres and Latour,the contemporary French thinkers,by theory of ANT,constructed quasi-objects composed of acteurs,however Latour neglected the dimension of totality,which led his theory towards contemporary Lebnizism. Simondon,instead,based on individuation and embodiment of objects through an associated milieu,developed the problem of modern technological object. Then Latour and Simondon provide for us an important theoretical foundation from different perspectives,by which,digital objects could be considered not only as a translator in ANT,but individuation in associated milieu,that is,a new model of quasi-object,which finally makes it possible for us to understand digital objects.

关 键 词：拟对象 数字对象 拉图尔 西蒙东 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]