检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶孝云
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第5期35-41,共7页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(11&ZD187);江苏省社会科学基金青年项目(16ZXC005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2062014261)
摘 要:信念等认知态度通常被认为是主体与命题间的一种关系,并且它们的内容也被认为是具有真假值的命题。但是这种观念却无法为从己信念的内容找到恰当的命题。而对"行为解释论证"和"两个上帝论证"的重构,可以说明从己信念问题的解决需要我们放弃关于信念等认知态度的主导观念——命题教条,即信念是主体与具有真假值的命题之间的关系,转而主张属性论,即信念是主体与自我归属的属性之间的关系。在考察了命题主义者对"两个上帝论证"及属性论的主要反驳后,就更有理由坚持属性论。Belief and other cognitive attitudes are usually considered as relations between subjects and propositions,and the contents of these attitudes are always considered as propositions with true or false value.However,this view cannot identify the appropriate proposition as the content of belief de se. On reconstructing the argument of explanation of behavior and the two gods argument,it is argued that the resolution of problem of belief de se requires us to refute the doctrine of propositions in the notion of belief and other cognitive attitudes,and maintain that belief is the relation between subjects and the properties self-ascribed. By reviewing the major arguments from the propositionalists against the two gods argument and property theory,it is the property theory that we should insist on to characterize the cognitive attitudes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74