生态环境损害赔偿归责宜采过错责任原则  

On Liability Principle of Ecological Damage Compensation

作　　者：晋海[1] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学法学院,江苏南京210098

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第5期89-96,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(B17020427)

摘　　要：无过错责任原则有其特定的价值蕴涵,它的产生使侵权责任法的哲学基础由矫正正义转向矫正正义与分配正义并存。与环境侵权制度相比,生态环境损害赔偿制度在保护法益、环境保护方式、调整范围、请求权基础、权利主体及原被告强弱地位等方面均存在不同特点。生态环境损害赔偿问题本质上是一个公法问题。生态环境损害赔偿责任并不符合无过错责任原则的法理与价值取向。生态环境损害赔偿应采过错责任原则,而不是无过错责任原则。Having its specific value implication,the principle of no-fault liability makes the philosophical basis of the tort liability law change from the corrective justice to the co-existence of corrective and distributive justice. Compared with the environmental tort system,different characteristics have been found in the ecological damage compensation system,which includes the protection of legal interest,the environmental protection mode,the justification range,the basis of claim right,the subject of rights and the status of the plaintiff and the defendant. Essentially,the problem of ecological damage compensation is one concerned with the public law. The liability of ecological damage compensation does not accord with the jurisprudence and value orientation of the principle of no-fault liability. The principle of fault liability should be taken to ecological damage compensation system,rather than the principle of no-fault liability.

关 键 词：生态环境损害赔偿责任 归责原则 过错责任 无过错责任 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]