检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆淼炯[1] 褚卫建[1] 夏瑜[1] 郑易[1] 黄海[2]
机构地区:[1]杭州市中医院肛肠外科,浙江杭州310007 [2]杭州市中医院外一科,浙江杭州310007
出 处:《中国现代医生》2017年第26期51-54,共4页China Modern Doctor
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81202821)
摘 要:目的比较内痔结扎外痔切除一期缝合术和传统Milligan-Morgan术的疗效及术后疼痛、水肿、出血等情况。方法将2015年1月~2016年12月就诊于我院肛肠外科的100例混合痔患者招募入组。随机将患者分为两组,试验组50例采用内痔结扎外痔切除一期缝合术,对照组50例采用传统Milligan-Morgan术。观察两组切口愈合时间、术后疼痛、水肿、出血等情况。结果试验组与对照组治愈率比较无显著差异(96%vs 94%,P>0.05)。试验组术后24 h(3.95±1.24 vs 5.85±1.56,P<0.05)、第一次排便时(5.85±1.66 vs 7.75±1.68,P<0.05)及术后第7天(2.45±1.09 vs 4.35±1.26,P<0.05)疼痛评分均显著低于对照组。试验组创面愈合时间(11.95±1.96 vs 17.85±2.35,P<0.05)、术后出血积分(1.05±0.31 vs 1.87±0.65,P<0.05)及术后水肿积分(0.58±0.22 vs 1.24±0.26,P<0.05)均显著低于对照组。结论与传统Milligan-Morgan术相比,内痔结扎外痔切除一期缝合术疗效肯定,愈合时间短,疼痛轻,术后并发症少。Objective To compare the efficacy and postoperative pain, edema and hemorrhage between internal hemorrhoid ligation external hemorrhoids resection primary suture and traditional Milligan-Morgan technique. Methods A total of 100 patients with mixed hemorrhoids in Department of Anorectal Surgery of our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. 50 patients in the experimental group were treated with internal hemorrhoid ligation and external hemorrhoids resection primary suture. 50 patients in the control group were treated with traditional Milligan-Morgan technique. The wound healing time, postoperative pain,edema and bleeding of the two groups were observed. Results There was no significant difference in the cure rate between the experimental group and the control group(96% vs 94%, P〉0.05). The pain score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 24 hours after surgery(3.95±1.24 vs 5.85±1.56,P〈0.05), at the first time of defecation(5.85±1.66 vs 7.75±1.68,P〈0.05), on the 7th day after surgery(2.45±1.09 vs 4.35±1.26,P〈0.05).Similar ly, the wound healing time, postoperative bleeding score and postoperative edema score in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(11.95±1.96 vs 17.85±2.35, P〈0.05),(1.05±0.31 vs 1.87±0.65, P〈0.05),(0.58±0.22 vs 1.24±0.26, P〈0.05),respectively. Conclusion Compared with the traditional Milligan-Morgan technique, the treatment of internal hemorrhoid ligation external hemorrhoids resection primary suture has positive effect, with short healing time, mild pain and few postoperative complications.
关 键 词:混合痔 内痔结扎 外痔切除一期缝合术 传统Milligan-Morgan术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.40.192