实际施工人对发包人诉权问题探讨——《司法解释》第26条第2款再思考  

Discussion on the Right of action of the Actual Construction Workers to the Principal——Rethinking about Article 26 Paragraph 2 of the Judicial Interpretation

作　　者：张仁藏 王凤[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京大成律师事务所,北京100020 [2]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《时代法学》2017年第5期89-96,共8页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：为了规范建设工程中发包承包活动,我国相关法律明令禁止非法转包、违法分包等行为。但由于利益驱使等原因,现实中普遍存在重重分包、转包的情形,导致对从事实际施工工作的主体的利益保护更为困难。基于此,最高人民法院制定司法解释确立了实际施工人概念,并对实际施工人诉权做了规定。该条规定由于突破合同相对性,在实践中面临着一些困境。因此有必要梳理实际施工人的概念和法律关系,论述实际施工人的请求权基础,明晰该制度的行使条件,思考其在司法实践中存在的问题,为完善实际施工人诉权制度提供思路。In order to standardize the contracting and contracting activities in construction pro-jects, the relevant laws of China prohibit illegal subcontracting and illegal subcontracting. However, due to reasons such as interests, multiple subcontracting and subcontracting are common, which leads to the protection of the actual construction workers more difficult. Based on this, the Supreme Peopled Court has formulated the judicial interpretation to establish the concept of the actual con-struction workers, and provide the actual construction of the right to appeal. Because the provisions break contract relativity rules, it faces some difficulties in practice. Therefore, it is necessary to sort out the concept and legal relationship of the actual construction workers, discuss the basis of the claim of the actual construction workers, clarify the conditions of the system, think about its prob-lems in the judicial practice, and provide the train of thought for perfecting the actual construction workers’ right of action.

关 键 词：实际施工人 代位权 权利范围 诉权 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]