中国省域大气环境效率的测算  

China's Provincial Air Environmental Efficiency Measurement

作　　者：汪克亮[1] 刘蕾[1] 孟祥瑞[1] 杨宝臣[2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学经济与管理学院,安徽淮南232001 [2]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072

出　　处：《统计与决策》2017年第20期97-101,共5页Statistics & Decision

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71403003);国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BJL105);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC790136);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2014M551787;2016T80643);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSK11-12D107);安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(gxyq ZD2016075)

摘　　要：基于区域技术异质性假定与共同边界理论,文章将大气污染排放物视为非期望产出,利用考虑投入产出松弛变量的SBM-Undesirable方法系统考察2006—2013年中国省域大气环境效率与大气环境治理技术的差异性,运用面板计量Tobit回归模型定量考察省域大气环境效率水平及其治理技术的影响机制。结果表明,中国大气环境效率较低且区域差异明显,三大区域之间大气环境治理技术落差较大,大气污染减排潜力巨大;经济增长、产业结构优化、科技创新、提升贸易开放度有利于促进大气环境效率及其治理技术的改善,相比之下,煤炭消费比重的提高与财政分权则起到了明显抑制作用。Based on the hypothesis of regional heterogeneity and meta-frontier theory, this paper views air pollution emission as undesirable output, and applies SBM-undesirable method which emphasizes output slack variable to systematically investigate the otherness between China＇ s provincial air environmental efficiency and air environmental treatment technology. And then the paper utilizes panel Tobit regression model to examine the influencing mechanism of China＇ s provincial air environmental effi- ciency and air environmental treatment technology. The empirical results indicate that China＇ s air environmental efficiency is gen- erally tow and regional differences are distinct; there exist considerable gaps in the air environmental treatment technology of the three regions, and large potential for China＇ s provincial air pollution emission reduction; economic growth, industrial structure op- timization, technological innovation and trade openness promotion all have positive effects on boosting the improvement of China＇ s air environmental efficiency and treatment technology, while increasing the ratio of coal consumption and fiscal decentralization have obvious inhibiting effects.

关 键 词：大气环境效率 异质性环境治理技术 共同边界 影响因素 TOBIT模型 

分 类 号：F061[经济管理—政治经济学]