大型铁矿高压辊磨与常规碎磨方案比较  

Comparison Between HPGR Scheme and Conventional Crushing & Grinding Scheme for Large-scale Iron Ore Mine

作　　者：任从坡 林建广[2] 廉海 何景玲 

机构地区：[1]华北理工大学矿业工程学院,河北唐山063000 [2]河北钢铁集团矿业有限公司,河北唐山063000 [3]承德龙兴矿业工程设计有限责任公司,河北承德067000 [4]中冶京诚(秦皇岛)工程技术有限公司,河北秦皇岛066000

出　　处：《矿业工程》2017年第5期38-42,共5页Mining Engineering

摘　　要：近年来,采用高压辊磨工艺处理低品位单一磁铁矿应用较为广泛,高压辊磨方案与常规磨矿方案相比,具有多碎少磨、碎矿能耗低、降低磨矿功耗、提前粗粒抛尾、减少入磨量、能提高后续磨机处理能力等优点。在相同条件下对两种方案从技术和经济上进行比较,计算了两种方案的耗材、耗电、经营费及投资费用,这对类似矿山在方案选择上有很强的参考意义。In recent years, high pressure grinding roller （HPGR） process is widely applied to process low grade monotonous magnetite. Compared with conventional grinding scheme, HPGR scheme is characterized by crushing more and grinding less, low energy consumption for ore crushing, decreased energy consumption for ore grinding, coarse particle tailings discarding in advance, reduction in amount of ores that need grinding and improvement on processing capacity of subsequent mills. Under the same conditions, the two schemes are compared from economic and technical aspects. Consumables, energy consumption, operating cost and investment cosf for the two schemes are calculated, which is very referential to scheme selection for similar mines.

关 键 词：高压辊磨 常规碎磨 铁矿 投资 

分 类 号：TD4[矿业工程—矿山机电]