不同雾化吸入方式对小儿哮喘治疗效果的对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Effects of Different Inhalation Methods on Asthma in Children

作　　者：李维芹 LI Weiqin(Department of Surgery, Qilu Children ＇s Hospital of Shandong University, Ji ＇nan Shandong 250022, Chin)

机构地区：[1]山东大学齐鲁儿童医院外科,山东济南250022

出　　处：《中国继续医学教育》2017年第23期175-177,共3页China Continuing Medical Education

摘　　要：目的比较分析不同雾化吸入方式对小儿哮喘治疗效果。方法选择本院2015年5月—2017年5月收治的哮喘患儿68例作为研究对象。将其随机分为两组,每组各34例患者。对A组患儿采用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗,对B组患儿采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,比较两组患儿治疗有效率。结果 A组患儿治疗有效率为94.12%,高于B组的73.53%,组间对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对哮喘患儿采用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗方式能够获得良好的疗效,预防疾病的进一步发展,且缓解患儿呼吸道症状。Objective To compare and analyze the effects of different inhalation methods on asthma in children. Methods 68 children with asthma treated in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, 34 patients in each group. Group A was treated with oxygen driven atomizing inhalation, group B was treated with air compression pump inhalation, compared the two groups of children with effective treatment. Results The effective rate of group A was 94.12%, which was obviously higher than that of group B （73.53%）, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The oxygen driven atomizing inhalation therapy can achieve good curative effect in children with asthma, and has higher value in clinical treatment.

关 键 词：氧驱动雾化 空气压缩泵雾化 小儿哮喘 治疗效果 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]