作为现代主义宣言的东方传统:3位西方建筑师与桂离宫(下)  

The Oriental Tradition as Modernist Manifesto: Three Western Architects and Katsura Imperial Villa(Part Ⅱ)

作　　者：杨涛[1] 魏春雨[1] 李鑫 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学建筑学院,长沙410082 [2]湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙410082

出　　处：《建筑学报》2017年第10期99-105,共7页Architectural Journal

基　　金：湖南省科技计划项目(2016SK2013)

摘　　要：以3位重要的西方建筑师与桂离宫的关系为切入点,梳理桂离宫与现代建筑发展历程之间的历史关联,指出关于桂离宫的解读中现代主义的片面性、建筑师的主观性,并阐释桂离宫对于当代日本及西方建筑学的影响。从建筑学批判性策略的角度,总结相关历史过程的当代意义:对传统的辩证解读,对西方价值体系的选择性认同,基于本土视角的文化再创造。Focusing on the connections between three influential Western architects and Katsura Imperial Villa, this paper examines the historical relationship between Katsura and the development of modern architecture. It also explicates the biases of modernism and architects＇ subjectivity within the interpretations of Katsura, and Katsura＇s influence on contemporary Japanese and Western architecture. In conclusion, this study offers insights for critical architectural strategies at several levels： a dialectical interpretation of tradition, a selective recognition of Western value system, and the cultural re- creation from a local perspective.

关 键 词：桂离宫 现代性 布鲁诺·陶特 瓦尔特·格罗皮乌斯 勒-柯布西耶 日本建筑 

分 类 号：TU-092[建筑科学—建筑理论]