检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田忠惠[1]
机构地区:[1]天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津300193
出 处:《天津中医药》2017年第10期673-676,共4页Tianjin Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:[目的]观察醒脑开窍针法加刺八脉交会穴治疗中风后运动性失语的临床疗效。方法选取研究对象为我科收治符合标准的56例病人,将其随机分为治疗组和对照组各28例。治疗组采用醒脑开窍针法加刺八脉交会穴治疗;对照组采用醒脑开窍针法治疗。治疗时间均为4周,每周治疗6次,分别在治疗前、治疗后采用波士顿失语诊断测验(BDAE)进行评级测定及根据日常生活交流能力量表(CADL)对治疗前后的交流能力进行评定。结果两组治疗后比较,失语症临床疗效差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论醒脑开窍针法加刺八脉交会穴丰富了醒脑开窍针法治疗中风后运动性失语的方法,值得在临床上进一步研究及推广应用。[Objective] To observe the clinical effect of the posterior motor aphasia in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. [Methods] Fifty-six patients with the standard were selected and randomly divided into treatment group and control group of 28 patients. The treatment group was treated by using the wake-up-head method. The control group was treated with an open-head method. Treatment time was 4 weeks, treatment 6 times per week, respectively before and after treatment using the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination (BDAE) rating determined and communication scale (CADL) according to the daily life of communication skills were assessed before and after treatment. [Results] The difference in clinical efficacy of aphasia was significant (P〈0.05). [Conclusion] It is worth to further study and popularize application in clinical practice.
分 类 号:R245.31[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229