《文心雕龙·隐秀》明代补文之来龙去脉及影响--兼论《文心雕龙》有关版本  

The Origin and Effect of Completed Words for Yinxiu of Wenxindiaolong in Ming Dynasty——On the Relevant Version of Wenxindiaolong

作　　者：朱供罗[1] 李笑频 

机构地区：[1]昆明学院人文学院,云南昆明650214

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2017年第5期87-93,共7页Journal of Kunming University

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目“《文心雕龙》‘依经立义’研究”(16xzw001)阶段性成果

摘　　要：《隐秀》补文始见天启二年梅六次校定重修本《文心雕龙》。《隐秀》明代补文有阮华山宋本、朱孝穆宋本两个源头,可梳理出四大线索:阮华山—钱允治;钱允治—许子洽—朱谋—梅子庾;朱孝穆—徐;钱允治—钱谦益—冯舒。以往学界对朱孝穆的身份有误解,其实朱孝穆即朱统锽,是朱谋第三子。朱孝穆所见宋本必为朱谋所见,如此则朱跋与徐跋矛盾明显,难辨真假。《隐秀》在清代又牵出贾人旧本、胡夏客宋本两大源头,形成何焯校本、黄叔琳辑注本、吴骞校本三大版本。纪昀指出补文为伪作,范文澜因而将其删除。The completed words of Yinxiu were firstly found in the revised version of the sixth version in Mei^s Wenxindiaolong. The two sources for the completed words in Ming dynasty were the versions by Ruan huashan and Zhu xiaomu respectively, and four main clues were Ruan huashan - Qian yunzhi, Qian yunzhi - Xu zizhi - Zhu mouwei - Mei ziyu, Zhu xiaomu - Xu bo and Qian yunzhi - Qian qia- nyi - Feng shu. Academic misunderstandings were found for Zhu xiaomu who was Zhu tonghuang actually and who was Zhu mouhan^s third son. The version seen by Zhu xiaomu may not be the one seen by Zhu mouhan. Then, the postscripts by Zhu mouhan and Xu bo are contradict to each other, and it is hard to distinguish. The following three versions by He zhuo, Huang shulin and Wu qian are found to be formed based on the two more sources of versions from a bookseller and Hu xiake in Qing dynasty. Ji xiaolan pointed out that the completed words were forged and they were deleted by Fan wenlan.

关 键 词：文心雕龙 隐秀 明代补文 版本 朱统镗 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]