毓贤与袁世凯对义和团认识政策的比较研究  

A Contrasting Research of the Understanding and Policies to the Boxer Movement from Yu Xian and Yuan Shikai

作　　者：宋永林[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学历史学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2017年第5期99-104,共6页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：义和团运动时期,毓贤与袁世凯对义和团运动起因的认识不尽相同,两者均认为基督教会势力的扩张和强横以及山东部分官员未能持平办理教案是直接原因;同时袁世凯又将德国入侵山东视为导致民教冲突和义和团运动兴起的主要原因。此外,在对待义和团的政策上,毓贤和袁世凯均采取"缉拿首要,解散胁从"的总方针,剿抚兼施;但是两者在处理义和团的严厉程度上存在差异。毓贤与袁世凯的剿抚策略对山东义和团运动的发展产生了不同影响。For the Boxer Movement, the understanding and attitude were different from Yu Xian and Yuan Shikai in the period of the Boxer Movement. They both agreed that the direct causes were the Christian rampancy and unfair dealing with the cases of Christians and non - Christians by some of the officials in Shandong province; meanwhile, Yuan Shikai regarded German invading Shandong and the growing of the Boxer Movement as the main causes for the conflicts between Christians and non - Christians. Additionally, both Yu Xian and Yuan Shikai took the main policies of arresting the heads of the movement and dismissing the rest participators and the simulta-neous subsidiary policies were suppressing and comforting. However, differences were also found between their degrees of dealing. Their different policies gave the different influences to the development of the Boxer Movement in Shandong province.

关 键 词：义和团运动 毓贤 袁世凯 剿抚政策 民教冲突 

分 类 号：K252[历史地理—历史学]