社会体育政策工具的绩效特征——基于31个省级《全民健身实施计划(2016-2020年)》的内容分析  

Performance Characteristics of Social Sports Policy Tools——Analysis of 31 Provincial “National Fitness Implementation Plan(2016—2020)”

作　　者：韩永君[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学公共管理学院,四川成都610065 [2]西北民族大学体育学院,甘肃兰州730124

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2017年第10期18-24,共7页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：甘肃省哲学社会科学规划项目(14YB027)

摘　　要：以萨拉蒙政策工具理论作为研究社会体育政策工具绩效特征的分析框架,以31个省级行政区域的《全民健身实施计划(2016-2020年)》为样本,采用内容分析法挖掘当前社会体育政策工具的类型特征。结果发现,基于工具不同类属的绩效特征差异较大。首先,基于强制类属的工具在效率方面有一定优势,但在有效性、公平性、易管理性和政治支持等方面表现一般;其次,基于直接类属的工具在有效性、公平性和易管理性方面有一定优势,而在效率性、适应性和政治支持方面表现较差;再次,基于自治类属的工具在有效性、公平性和政治支持等方面有一定优势,而在效率和适应性方面表现较差;最后,基于可见类属的工具在效率和公平性方面有优势,而在易管理性和政治支持方面表现较差。This paper used the theory of Salamon＇s policy tool as a research framework to study the performance characteristics of social sports policy instruments by taking the＂National Fitness Implementation Plan（2016—2020）＂in 31 provincial administrative regions as the object of study.It was found that the performance characteristics of different types of tools were different.Firstly,the tools based on compulsory categories were better in terms of efficiency,but not in terms of effectiveness,fairness,manageability,and political support.Secondly,based on the effectiveness,fairness and easiness of tools,there were certain advantages in terms of management,but disadvantages in terms of efficiency,adaptability and political support.The tools based on autonomous genres had some advantages in terms of effectiveness,fairness and political support,but disadvantages in inefficiency and adaptation.Finally,tools based on visible categories had advantages in terms of efficiency and fairness,and disadvantages in terms of manageability and political support.

关 键 词：全民健身计划 健康中国 体育管理 社会体育政策 政策工具理论 绩效特征 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]