检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪文颖[1]
出 处:《河南机电高等专科学校学报》2017年第4期64-67,共4页Journal of Henan Mechanical and Electrical Engineering College
摘 要:英国行政裁判所制度作为法院之外的行政纠纷解决机制有其自身优势,发展至今已成为英国解决行政纠纷的主渠道。2007年英国行政裁判所经历了里程碑式的改革,构建了两级的行政裁判所体系,统一了行政裁判所程序规则,完善了监督救济机制,促进了裁判所发展。行政复议作为我国法院之外的行政争议解决机制与英国裁判所有相似之处,行政复议制度面临的问题也在敦促我国行政复议制度的完善,英国行政裁判所改革为我国行政复议制度的完善提供了可借鉴的经验。The British system of administrative tribunals as an administrative dispute resolution outside thecourt has its own advantages, the development has become the main force of the United Kingdom to resolveadministrative disputes, the Administrative Tribunal in the UK in 2007 experienced a landmark reform, buildingthe administrative levels the referee system, the unification of the rules of procedure of administrative tribunals,improve the supervision mechanism of relief, promoting the development of referees. The administrativereconsideration as administrative disputes outside of court mechanism to solve the problem with the Britishreferee all the similarities, the Administrative Review System of Administrative Reconsideration facing urgedmodify, British Administrative Tribunal of Administrative Reconsideration System Reform to provide perfectexperience.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44