三种资本双重性理论的比较--马克思、蒲鲁东、西美尔  

Comparison of Three Kinds of Capital Dualism Theory——Marx,Proudhon and Simmel

作　　者：贾丽民 孔扬[2] Jia Limin Kong Yang(Marxism School, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Aviation University Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学马克思主义学院,天津300387 [2]空军航空大学人文社会科学系,吉林长春130022

出　　处：《教学与研究》2017年第10期21-26,共6页Teaching and Research

基　　金：2014年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“马克思资本双重性思想及当代价值研究”(项目号:14BZX011);2013年度教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“历史唯物主义视域中资本逻辑批判及当代价值研究”(项目号:13YJC720017)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在现代思想谱系中,不仅马克思系统地阐发了其资本双重性理论,而且蒲鲁东、西美尔等人也提出了对资本积极性和消极性的理解。但是,相似形式的背后,却是三种资本双重性理论的原则区别,具体体现在:(1)各自得出资本双重性结论的世界观前提不同,(2)各自对资本双重性历史内涵的阐发不同,(3)各自提出的克服由资本双重性造成的现代生产生活异化状态的社会改造方案不同。划清三者的界限,对于准确把握马克思的历史唯物主义和辩证法思想、清除"《货币哲学》是《资本论》续篇"的流俗见解等等,具有重要的学术意义。In the modern ideological system, not only Marx systematically expounded his theory of capitial duality, Proudhon, Simmel also put forward the positive and negative understanding of capital. However, behind the similar form, there is principle difference between the three theories of capital duality. This is reflected in. （1） the premise of different world view in the respective capital duality conclusion. （2） the difference in the historical connotation analysis of capital duality. （3） the difference in proposed social transformation scheme to overcome the alienation of production and life caused by the dual nature of capital. To kake a clear distinction between the three is of important academic significance for us to accurately grasp the Marx＇s historical materialism and dialectics, clear the vulgar opinions such as Philosophy of Money is a sequel to Das Kapital, and so on.

关 键 词：资本双重性理论 马克思 蒲鲁东 西美尔 

分 类 号：F014.39[经济管理—政治经济学]