检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张伟[1] 张继芝[1] 王春娥[1] 刘爱玲[1] 刘宏[1] ZHANG Wei ZHANG Ji-zhi WANG Chun-e LIU Ai-ling LIU Hang(The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng,Liaocheng,252600, Chin)
机构地区:[1]聊城市第二人民医院,山东省聊城市252600
出 处:《中华护理教育》2017年第10期725-728,共4页Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
摘 要:目的探讨应用根本原因分析行动(root cause analysis and actions,RCA^2)降低ICU患者非计划拔管的方法和效果。方法应用RCA^2对ICU患者非计划拔管的问题进行干预,主要包括:组建团队,收集资料;查找直接原因;确认根本原因;拟定改善计划;落实改善计划。比较干预前后ICU患者的非计划拔管率。结果 ICU患者的非计划拔管率干预前为2.56%(20/782),干预后为0.41%(3/736),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=11.745,P<0.001)。结论RCA^2的系统干预有效降低ICU患者非计划拔管发生率,规范化的科学管理和多部门协作有助于保障患者安全。Objective To evaluate the effects of root cause analysis and actions (RCA^2) on reducing unplanned extubation of patients in ICU. Methods Interventions were implemented by using RCA^2 to deal with the unplanned extubation of patients in ICU. Details were as follows :building up the team and collecting data;looking for the direct reasons,identifying the root causes,making planning,and implementing the interventions. The unplanned extubation rate of ICU patients before and after the intervention was compared. Results The incidence of unplanned extubation of patients before the intervention was 2.56% (20/782),while it was 0.41%(3/736) after the intervention. The differences were statistically significant (χ^=11.745,P〈0.001). Conclusion RCA2 can effectively reduce the incidence of unplanned extubation in ICU patients. Standardized scientific management and collaboration among different departments can contribute to patient safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13