基于违约形态的合同解除之法定解除权的比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Decentralization of Contract

作　　者：陈欢欢[1] CHENG Huan-huan(College of Law, Guangxi University, Nanning Guangxi 530004, Chin)

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第10期86-90,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：由于合同自治原则的建立及认同,当双方当事人未在合同中约定导致合同解除的条件时,法定解除权是当事人利益、及时止损的一道重要保障。但我国合同法对法定解除权的规定存在诸多冲突及不完善之处,如引进大陆法系的不安抗辩权与英美法系的预期违约,且两者在解除权的规定中相互冲突,催告程序的适用范围适用及"合理期限"时间的不确定等。本文以各种违约行为所导致的合同法定解除权为视角,通过对违约形态的中外比较研究分析,在借鉴国外立法经验的基础上,提出适宜我国具体国情的本土化方案。Due to the establishment and recognition of the principle of contract autonomy, when the parties do not stipulate tile conditions for the termination in the contract, the legal right of the contract is an important tool to guarantee the interests of the parties and avoid the loss timely. However, there are many conflicts and imperfections in the provisions of the contract law on the legM right of rescission,such as the introduction of the civil law of the uncompromising right of defense and the Anglo-American legal system is ex- peeted to default, and the two in the lifting of the provisions of the conflict, besides, the application of the tn＇ging process and the reasonable time is uncertain. On the basis of the experience of foreign legislation, this thesis puts forward the localization scheme suitable for China＇s speciiie national conditions through the comparative analysis of the default forms.

关 键 词：合同解除 法定解除权 违约行为 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]