检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王玎[1]
出 处:《行政与法》2017年第10期91-98,共8页Administration and Law
摘 要:从行政公益诉讼试点的情况来看,在行政公益诉讼中主要由检察机关承担举证责任,公益受到侵害是检察机关承担举证责任的主要内容,行政机关不承担主要举证责任。本文认为,配置行政公益诉讼举证责任,应当考虑诉讼的目的、依法行政原则、与证据距离的远近、先前程序中的举证责任分配情况等因素。在行政公益诉讼中,应当明晰作为和不作为两类行政公益诉讼的举证责任,以期完善检察机关调查取证制度。From the administrative public: interest litigation in terms of the pilot in the administrative public welfare law- suit is mainly composed of procuratorial organ to assume the burden of proof,public welfare are violated is the main content of the procuratorial organ to assume the burden of proof,the administrative organ does not bear the major bur- den of proof.This paper argues that ,configure the administrative public interest litigation the burden of proof,should con- sider the purpose of litigation evidence,the principle of administration according to law,and the distance,the burden of proof allocation situation factor,such as in the previous program.In the administrative public: interest litigation,should be clear as and not as two kind of administrative public interest litigation of burden of proof,in order to improve the sys- tem of procuratorial organs investigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244