检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学经济学院 [2]吉林大学经济学院国际经济系
出 处:《亚太经济》2017年第5期38-46,共9页Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基 金:教育部规划基金项目"中美经济相互依赖及其非对称性特征:基于世界经济格局视角的研究"(项目编号13YJA790126)的阶段性成果
摘 要:通过构建纳入金融监管指标的金融国际竞争力评价体系,研究中美两国在金融国际竞争力上存在差距的制度性因素,并在此基础上分析中美双边金融市场开放过程中的监管约束。评价结果显示,在2010-2015年这一期间,中美两国的金融国际竞争力都有所提升但差距较大,且相差程度在样本年份内并未发生明显变化;特别是两国在金融法规及监管理念上存在明显的冲突,由此强化了两国金融国际竞争力差距对双边金融市场开放的负面影响。为了进一步以金融改革促进金融开放,中国金融监管当局应该利用在上海自贸区推行的金融改革试验,从总体上提升中国金融市场的开放水平;并且应该通过双边经济对话机制,增进两国之间在金融监管体制方面的认同感。This paper studies the institutional reasons for a huge gap in the international competitiveness of finance between China and the U nited States,and analyzes the bilateral financial regulatory constraints in the process of financial market opening,by constructing a financial international competitiveness evaluation system including supervision indicators.The results showthat during 2010-2015,the financial international competitiveness of the two countries are both improved,but the gap is still big in the sample years; Especially there is an obvious conflict in the financial regulations and regulatory concept between the two countries,which strengthen the negative impact of financial international competitiveness gap on the openness of bilateral financial markets. In order to promote the financial openness,China's financial regulatory authorities should take advantage of a pilot financial reform in Shanghai Free Trade Z one; in addition,China should promote the identity of the financial regulatory system between the two countries through bilateral economic dialogue mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.240.192