侦查讯问录音录像的案件适用范围刍议  

A Discussion on Criminal Case Application Range for Video and Audio Recording of Investigative Interrogation

作　　者：王仲羊 张志伟 裘树祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学刑事侦查学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《广西警察学院学报》2017年第5期27-33,共7页Journal of Guangxi Police College

基　　金：2016年西南政法大学学生科研创新计划资助项目(2016XZXS-087)

摘　　要：侦查讯问录音录像的案件适用范围,呈现出强制性与任意性的二元对立格局,形成了管辖主体、案件性质与量刑幅度的多重界分标准。对该案件适用范围进行阶段性检视,发现立法例外规定缺位、能力结构承接乏力、控辩启动权能失衡,以及证据使用禁止困境丛生等衍生问题。要廓清立法的除外规定、强化获取客观证据的侦查能力、促进录音录像制度转型、完善证据使用禁止的相关规定,以厘清侦查讯问录音录像案件适用范围的规制路径。Crimin al case application range for video and audio recording of investigative interrogation takes on coerciveness-arbitrariness binary opposition format,resulting in multiple divisions standard for jurisdiction subjects,case nature and extent of criminal punishment.The phased view of criminal case application range demonstrates lack of legislation exception provisions,weak competence structure undertaking strength,imbalanced accusation and defence power,and prohibited use of evidences.Accordingly,efforts should be made to clarify legislation exception provisions,intensify investigation abiliity to acquire objective evidences,promote video and audio recording system transformation,improve the relavant provisions for prohibited use of evidences with a view to shaping the regulation approach for criminal case application range for video and audio recording of investigative interrogation.

关 键 词：侦查讯问 录音录像 案件适用范围 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]